This article doesn’t ask if people playing a game called Chinese Whispers without any knowledge of the origin of the term are being racist. It seems rather obvious that if someone has no idea that they are doing something racist then they by definition are not, because racism requires intent. If that’s the case, I’m afraid this is not a very interesting argument to me. a group of children playing a game they know to be called Chinese Whispers are not being racist if they are not aware of the possible racist origin of the name. Your argument appears to be that intent is the determining factor as to whether something is racist or not, i.e. I have never heard the game of Chinese whispers referred to as telephone before so I suspect that most people in UK would be unfamiliar with it also (similar to how we know the song as “okey cokey” but the rest of the world knows it as “hokey pokey”). I have been using the term “Chinese whispers” all my life (though not often, as I kind of grew out of this game fairly early on) without any thought to its origin. ![]() So when something goes completely wrong due to incompetence or stupidity leading to mass confusion, it got called a Chinese firedrill, the implication being that Chinese are stupid, and they can’t communicate clearly. It basically got blamed on the Chinese for being stupid. Chinese firedrill is named after a fire drill done on a ship with Chinese crew who didn’t understand what was going on, the end result being it all got screwed up. ![]() You may not know, because I didn’t know until I looked it up very recently, that the term is a very colonial one (late 19th, early 20th century British empire) and refers to a game which most of the rest of the world knows as “ Telephone“.Īs far as I have been able to determine, Chinese whispers is derived from another phrase, Chinese fire drill. Here’s something I’ve been pondering recently.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |